Stefan Tilkov retweeted
Was mir die Tage zu Armin Laschet einfiel und darüber, was die politische Branche mit Menschen macht. Ich weiß, nicht soooo neu, aber es sollte einen, finde ich, nie kalt lassen.
18
75
7
343
Stefan Tilkov retweeted
Die Fernsehmeteorologen haben die Faxen dicke und arbeiten mit Guerilla-Klimaberichterstattung soweit wie möglich gegen das flächendeckende Versagen auch öffentlich-rechtlicher Sender beim wichtigsten Thema der Welt an. @TerliWetter, @KSchwanke und andere verdienen Anerkennung.
„Die Zahl von Naturkatastrophen nimmt im Zuge des Klimawandels enorm zu. In Genua vielen 740,6 L/qm Regen in 12 Stunden, zum Vergleich, diese Menge fällt in Hamburg in einem ganzen Jahr!“
#KlimakriseISTjetzt #tagesthemen
32
663
18
3,122
Stefan Tilkov retweeted
STOP GIVING TEAMS AND SERVICES STUPID CODENAMES JUST NAME THEM BY THE THINGS THEY ARE IT MAKES LIFE SO MUCH EASIER IT ENCOURAGES YOU TO SLICE BY BUSINESS FUNCTION IT PUSHES YOU TO ASK BETTER QUESTIONS IT JUST MAKES SENSE CODENAMES AREN'T BIG OR CLEVER
8
10
2
53
Stefan Tilkov retweeted
The Web would be a vastly more accessible place if professional Web developers had even a basic understanding of HTML
17
74
13
351
To me, there’s an incredible amount of bullshit in that space that defrauds investors, furthers scams, and hurts the folks who actually want to pursue some of the technically interesting new options it creates.
I don’t have a startup, but on a working, non-PoW Ethereum-style platform, extremely complicated rules about licensing music right would be a fantastic example for decentralization, i.e. getting rid of the labels as intermediaries. Doesn’t matter whether you’d call that an NFT
1
Stefan Tilkov retweeted
Accessibility betrifft mich und meine Zielgruppe nicht – eine leider weit verbreitete Meinung. Warum das Gegenteil der Fall ist und uns #Accessibility alle angeht, darüber spricht Andreas Maier am 14.10. beim INNOQ Accessibility Day. Jetzt anmelden #a11y 👉accessibilityday.innoq.com/p…
4
4
I think there are people who believe in it as a way towards a different and better financial system, but the criticism of cryptocurrencies as a public blockchain application is the one I have the least disagreements with
Yet its purpose is reduced to speculation, Ponzi schemes, and scams, and everyone who looks at it for genuinely interesting purposes is lumped together with the criminals and their naive victims.
1
1
I’m not saying that is not happening. I’m arguing it’s not the purpose Bitcoin or Ethereum have been created for, and they have value beyond that, at least potentially. And it’s not the motivation for everyone who’s involved.
2