If your top level architecture diagram includes a product name, even if it’s an open source product, chances are you’re missing something in terms of long-term stability
1
28
3
80
I do not understand. Could show an example?
1
I read this as a “your framework is not your architecture” kind of statement, but I may be wrong.
1
Replying to @sebroeder @takacsot
An example would a big commercial ESB or EAI or DB product in the center, but the same is true for something like Kafka. I have no objections to using any of these, but not as the long-lived strategy for integration

May 17, 2018 · 8:00 AM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov @sebroeder @takacsot
Could you please advise on alternatives, in your experience?
1
Sticking to standard protocols and formats wherever possible, e.g. using something like Atom for cross-system events