I fail to get how online services that support a “signature” make sense. I’m talking about those things that allow a user to draw something that almost looks like a real-world, hand-written signature on a screen on top of a line in a PDF. What am I missing?
6
1
1
I am not disputing that signing a document electronically (i.e., with your private key) is a very good approach. Is this what this is referring to? Or does it refer to the drawing approach?
1
Your question had me look it up and was surprised to see that both the drawing approach and the digital(cryptography) one are on par and therefore admissible in court. I would have guessed the drawing approach as you suggested would be useless for that.
1
1
Replying to @CarloKuip
Which jurisdiction does that apply to?

May 8, 2018 · 7:39 AM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
Seems to work in the EU eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-cont… There is however a distinction between types of signatures. So I guess it's still up to a lawyer to verify applicability.
1