. @simonbrown gets rid of UML and notation to introduce his C4. It does not feel declarative or semantic to me. @stilkov thinks differently?
4
Replying to @Heimeshoff @simonbrown
I'm ambiguous on the issue. I both like and dislike the fact that C4 ignores UML

Jun 28, 2017 · 7:33 PM UTC

2
1
Replying to @stilkov @Heimeshoff
Question for you … how would you describe the information in this diagram using UML?
Replying to @stilkov @Heimeshoff
Another way to look at this is that perhaps, as an industry, we need to go backwards in order to progress?
1