This is 100% correct: Conceptually, UML is fine, and C4 adds nothing new; also, UML suffers from excessive bloat and all UML tools suck.
James Depoorter @JamesDepoorter
24 Jun 2017
Replying to @JamesDepoorter @simonbrown @structurizr
In essence is C4 a chosen subset of UML, which could be expressed with a UML profile, stereotyping/extending base uml concepts
7
7
28
To be clear: if @simonbrown's C4 ends up leading to a renaissance of models with well-defined semantics, I'm all for it
3
3
13
Rennaissance? They are alive and well #DSLs
1
Do you regularly see teams using DSLs for modelling and communicating software architecture?
1
yes
2
Replying to @markusvoelter @simonbrown
That just might be related to selection bias :)

Jun 26, 2017 · 5:54 AM UTC

1
2
Replying to @stilkov @markusvoelter
Which works both ways, of course ... I don't tend to visit teams that already understand modelling. 🙂