This is 100% correct: Conceptually, UML is fine, and C4 adds nothing new; also, UML suffers from excessive bloat and all UML tools suck.
James Depoorter @JamesDepoorter
24 Jun 2017
Replying to @JamesDepoorter @simonbrown @structurizr
In essence is C4 a chosen subset of UML, which could be expressed with a UML profile, stereotyping/extending base uml concepts
7
7
28
To be clear: if @simonbrown's C4 ends up leading to a renaissance of models with well-defined semantics, I'm all for it

Jun 25, 2017 · 8:03 AM UTC

3
3
13
Replying to @stilkov
I would be happy with that as an outcome. 🙂
1
4
Replying to @stilkov @simonbrown
There are now standard, precise, operational semantics for a significant chunk of #UML: OO, activities, composite structure, state machines.
1
Replying to @stilkov @simonbrown
Rennaissance? They are alive and well #DSLs
1