My colleague @moonbeamlabs decided to test our new comments feature with a blog post on FP vs. OO: innoq.com/en/blog/fp-vs-oo/

Dec 14, 2016 · 5:13 AM UTC

2
14
21
Replying to @tldr__lol @mathiasverraes @moonbeamlabs
So you're saying SOLID principles don't apply to FP?
1
1
more replies
Replying to @stilkov @moonbeamlabs @INNOQ
will it scale to vim / emacs?
1
We'll do some SPA and hypermedia posts before daring to try that
1
Replying to @tldr__lol
Interesting, i would claim that S, O, L apply :) @mathiasverraes @moonbeamlabs
1
1
more replies
Replying to @tldr__lol
How so? It's easy to explain SOLID using plain C examples @mathiasverraes @moonbeamlabs
1
more replies
However, it is still possible to construct things in FP that violate SRP.
1
You are not seriously suggesting you can't violate any of the principles in an OO language, are you?
1
more replies
Replying to @moonbeamlabs @stilkov
It was a joke, not sure why this needs an explanation
Replying to @tldr__lol @stilkov @moonbeamlabs
That feels like defining the problem in terms of a possible solution.
Replying to @tldr__lol @stilkov @moonbeamlabs
OCP is not about classes and inheritance.
1
Load more