earlier replies
Replying to @lukaseder
.@lukaseder @JAXenterCOM Brazilian government tried that once. Failed big time.
1
1
Interesting! Do you have a link?
1
here is one case: softwarelivre.org/portal/not…
2
1
1
There are also reports the city of Munich tried and failed, their truthfulness hotly debated.
2
1
most common case is attempt to adopt Linux Desktop and LibreOffice. Often they fail, sadly IMHO.
1
True, but not the point of this discussion, AFAICT
1
1
correct. And I support 100% that software produced by Govs should be open sourced and publicly available
3
I worked for gov IT div. once&I think their code is better to be closed than open sometimes ;)
1
2
regardless of quality: you pay taxes that support the cost of any gov. software. So you own it.
1
which means I own it regardless of the license...?
1
Replying to @lukaseder @brunoborges @lucaguada
No, in many cases even custom-developed software is only licensed for use

Jul 12, 2016 · 4:53 AM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov @lukaseder @lucaguada
you should always have the right to see it, not always to use it... :-)
1
Last word before I see myself out: 99% don't care and those who do will use the knowledge to bikeshed tab-vs-spaces :P
2