“What’s in a Name: Transparency” (by @gernotstarke) – I’ve always been puzzled by people using it as its opposite innoq.com/de/blog/whats-in-a…

May 18, 2016 · 4:18 AM UTC

4
2
6
Replying to @stilkov
what opposite? I think transparency is necessary but abstractions and opaqueness are useful for discussions @gernotstarke
1
I meant that people use the word when what they should be using is “opaque”
1
I always wondered: why do people consider white boxes more transparent than black ones?
2
This tweet is unavailable
True, maybe network transparency is not the best example.