@jboner With all due respect, “synchronous REST over HTTP as a communication protocol” is a terminology disaster :-)
1
1
@stilkov I know it's a simplification. But that's how most people think about it. Just trying to make them rethink their defaults.
1
@jboner “synchronous HTTP as a communication protocol” would be better, even though what I really think you’re criticizing is “naïve RPC”
1
@stilkov I'm criticizing "traditional" sync RPC. The prob is that REST is often used that way—wrongly. There is nothing wrong w/ REST per-se
2
@jboner Great! Thanks. Now I can disagree on a different level ;-)
1