earlier replies
Replying to @ewolff
@ewolff @markusvoelter years ago ppl were claiming OSGi ~ SOA. Now microservices. One is an archichitectureal style, the other technology
2
2
@berndkolb @ewolff … making sure OSGiis part of the (then) current hype.
1
@markusvoelter @berndkolb the reason why I'm looking for a different name is because I think it's not Microservices
1
@ewolff @markusvoelter exactly. It is a technology that can be used (internally) to implement microservices, the architectural style
1
@berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter I believe the architectural style is still SOA. Micro/Nanoservices are design approaches to realize it.
2
2
2
@taval @berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter I might agree if you can point to a formal, accepted definition of the SOA architectural style :-)
5
@stilkov @taval @berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter accepted by whom? Btw I agree. SOA does have all elements you can find in the usrvcs arch.
1
@ilxs @stilkov @taval @berndkolb @markusvoelter WS-* and ESBs??
1
@ewolff @ilxs @stilkov @berndkolb @markusvoelter SOA is the architectural style. WS-* is a technology stack to realize SOA...
2
@taval @ilxs @stilkov @berndkolb @markusvoelter I wouldn't be too sure whether your definition (that I agree with) is shared by the majority
2
Replying to @ewolff
@ewolff @taval @ilxs @berndkolb @markusvoelter No agreement on the definition of “SOA” has been reached in what, 10 years? 15? Pointless.

Feb 19, 2016 · 10:51 AM UTC

3
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @ewolff @taval @berndkolb @markusvoelter as you can say about microservices. We - people don't agree about a lot of stuff
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @ewolff @taval @berndkolb @markusvoelter was working on an project in the early SOA time. We ditched a lot from ibm vision of it
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @ewolff @taval @berndkolb @markusvoelter in the end it was rather successful. Some important projects in Croatia were built on it