earlier replies
Replying to @markusvoelter
@markusvoelter Well, actually I am trying to point out how OSGi Nanoservices are different from say Docker-based Microservices
1
1
@ewolff I just think this whole OSGi thingy has nothing to with this whole Microservices thing.
1
2
@markusvoelter Well, they have small services, too. See bit.ly/1Vq2lzi
2
@ewolff @markusvoelter is a dep. injection fw then a nano service fw? Makes no sense... Does not help if we give everything the same name!
1
1
@berndkolb @markusvoelter OSGi offers a form of separate deployment IMHO a central property of Nano/Microservices . DI doesn't
1
@ewolff @markusvoelter years ago ppl were claiming OSGi ~ SOA. Now microservices. One is an archichitectureal style, the other technology
2
2
@berndkolb @ewolff … making sure OSGiis part of the (then) current hype.
1
@markusvoelter @berndkolb the reason why I'm looking for a different name is because I think it's not Microservices
1
@ewolff @markusvoelter exactly. It is a technology that can be used (internally) to implement microservices, the architectural style
1
@berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter I believe the architectural style is still SOA. Micro/Nanoservices are design approaches to realize it.
2
2
2
Replying to @taval
@taval @berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter I might agree if you can point to a formal, accepted definition of the SOA architectural style :-)

Feb 19, 2016 · 7:31 AM UTC

5
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter I can't, so if you disagree, what kind of a thing are Microservices then? Classification-wise.
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @taval @ewolff @markusvoelter sending lots of XML encoded data through many indirections and network to connect a printer. #kidding
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @taval @berndkolb @ewolff The point is that our community has the tendendy to put all kinds of things under the current …
1
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @taval @berndkolb @ewolff … buzzword, thereby diluting every term to the point they lose all of their meaning.
1
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @taval @berndkolb @ewolff @markusvoelter accepted by whom? Btw I agree. SOA does have all elements you can find in the usrvcs arch.
1