Any proposal for non-textual programming languages will take off as soon as the number of tools is equal to those for files /cc @raganwald
1
1
Replying to @bascht
@bascht @raganwald Good point. Also, the only successful “programming language” for end users I know of.

Nov 30, 2015 · 7:43 PM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @bascht @raganwald simulink? Ascet? Mathematica? Maple? It's just that they are dedicated to certain domains...
1
@berndkolb @bascht @raganwald You are right, should have qualified that as “general purpose” PLs
1
more replies