@stilkov absolutely no reason to confuse bigotry against Muslims & criticism of fundamental Islam. Former is despicable, the latter is not.
1
1
@zeevs I completely agree. All religions merit being criticized.
1
1
@stilkov @zeevs They are all wrong in the sense of truthiness. But they are not equally dangerous.
1
1
Replying to @codeblogger
@codeblogger @zeevs How so? They’ve all managed to create murderous zealots at different times.

Nov 25, 2015 · 8:55 PM UTC

8
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov an occasional murderous whacko is fundamentally different from systemic indoctrination to supremacy and murder. @codeblogger
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov whackos would be whackos with or without religion. Systemic indoctrination can turn normal people into beasts. @codeblogger
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov And while Christianity had its bloody periods, no doubt, they’re behind it. @codeblogger
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Judaism never had them, except for perhaps the case of Amalek in biblical times. @codeblogger
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Today, there is just one, active and remarkably dangerous religious doctrine that is expansionist and murderous. @codeblogger
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov That doctrine is fundamental Islam. @codeblogger
4
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov If your core principle is nonviolence (Jainism) then the discussion is over. The more extreme you get the more peaceful you are.
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov One need to have an actual look at the believes. Motives matter. ISIS could easily do stem cell research. Christianity cannot.
1