@kellabyte There’s a view on architecture that considers technology unimportant, and I couldn’t disagree more. But that’s not DDD.
3
2
@stilkov I feel that the book does in fact lean towards this way in some of its wording. You don’t need to follow completely though.
2
Replying to @kellabyte
@kellabyte There are many good concepts in that book. E.g. an ACL is a very common concept. Taken to the extreme, they lead to bad decisions

Oct 19, 2015 · 5:57 AM UTC

2
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Like it’s great we have put more focus on the business behaviour than in the past but how computers work kind of matters.
1
1
5
@kellabyte I can’t disagree with that :-)
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Oh yeah, not saying the whole thing is bad. But there’s a fundamental mismatch in some places IMO.