nitter
Stefan Tilkov
@stilkov
19 Oct 2015
@kellabyte
There’s a view on architecture that considers technology unimportant, and I couldn’t disagree more. But that’s not DDD.
Oct 19, 2015 · 5:49 AM UTC
3
2
Kelly Sommers
@kellabyte
19 Oct 2015
Replying to
@stilkov
@stilkov
I feel that the book does in fact lean towards this way in some of its wording. You don’t need to follow completely though.
2
Stefan Tilkov
@stilkov
19 Oct 2015
@kellabyte
There are many good concepts in that book. E.g. an ACL is a very common concept. Taken to the extreme, they lead to bad decisions
2
more replies
Kelly Sommers
@kellabyte
19 Oct 2015
Replying to
@stilkov
@stilkov
The idea you can write a business model and then decide to use a read committed DB, or a serializable DB or event source in lunacy.
1
Kelly Sommers
@kellabyte
19 Oct 2015
Replying to
@stilkov
@stilkov
Yes the code will work. The data will save. But in production it will NOT behave the same.