earlier replies
Replying to @russmiles
@russmiles could it? would it?
1
@arungupta it might be a useful option
1
@russmiles theoretically yes, practically? do you know anybody doing that?
2
@arungupta @stilkov has a similar concept of single purpose applications -> innoq.com/blog/st/2014/11/we… // @russmiles
1
1
2
@simonbrown @arungupta @russmiles Yes. I am strongly in favor of viewing UI and backend as one unit (by default)
2
@stilkov how to ensure the experience to user is not patched up UI from silos, esp if different stacks are used? // @simonbrown @russmiles
1
1
@arungupta a standard style guide and set of images, CSS, etc? // @stilkov @russmiles
1
@simonbrown does that work in practice across polyglot stacks? // @stilkov @russmiles
2
@arungupta if done well, yes, I don’t see why not e.g. -> codeforamerica.org/communica… // @stilkov @russmiles
1
@simonbrown @arungupta @stilkov @russmiles sounds like you're reinventing portlets.
2
1
Replying to @gareth
@gareth @simonbrown @arungupta @russmiles No, I hate portals/portlets with a vengeance. They just re-invent something the Web can do, badly.

May 20, 2015 · 4:27 PM UTC
1