On the blog (it's mostly finished) … "Package by component and architecturally-aligned testing" -> codingthearchitecture.com/20…
6
18
22
@simonbrown Interesting stuff, I will comment at some point as I have Views. I strongly favour Package By Feature for example
1
@AgileSteveSmith look forward to it (I've heard others say the same)
2
@simonbrown @AgileSteveSmith If your granularity of component is based around a feature you're talking about the same thing :).
1
@chrisoldwood @AgileSteveSmith very true, although I always keep the (e.g.) web models and controllers separate from the "components"
1
@simonbrown yes that's Ports And Adapters 101 @chrisoldwood
2
@simonbrown Package By Feature enables Vertical Divide and Conquer, incremental move to microservices alwaysagileconsulting.com/ap… @chrisoldwood
3
2
@agilestevesmith @stilkov talks about the concept of a single purpose system(?), which is essentially a full vertical slice @chrisoldwood
2
@simonbrown @agilestevesmith @chrisoldwood I’ve settled on calling them “self-contained systems”, but yes.
Mar 8, 2015 · 9:28 PM UTC
1