“$3 Million for more intelligent deep links that make apps work like the web” – Please shoot me now techcrunch.com/2014/09/23/br…
9
13
15
@stilkov @distobj I kept reading for the punch line... Then I saw it's not The Onion. :-{
1
1
@dckc @stilkov mobile apps are this decade's WS-*. Bet against the Web (or fail to grok it) at your peril!
4
5
2
@distobj @stilkov @dckc seriously? Mobile apps might make perfectly good Web clients.
1
@jimwebber @distobj @dckc They do if they consume perfectly good Web sites (or something very similar). Mostly they don’t.
1
@stilkov @jimwebber @distobj @dckc I don't believe that rendering HTML is a prerequisite for being a good web citizen.
1
@darrel_miller @jimwebber @distobj @dckc I agree, but the more conceptually similar to HTML your format is, the more "of the Web" it will be
2
@stilkov Agreed. However, HTML is optimal for presenting text based information. For rich data interaction and capture it is suboptimal.
2
@darrel_miller Most definitely suboptimal. Yet proven, mature, supported, standardized, often done anyway …
1
@stilkov Polyfilla is proven, mature and supported, but you don't build houses out of it. ;-)
3
Replying to @darrel_miller
@darrel_miller True. I just can’t help noticing that people keen adding more and more HTML features to JSON-based formats.

Sep 24, 2014 · 1:02 PM UTC

1
1
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov That's because many devs don't think of HTML as having semantics, just a container. So ends up having no advantages over JSON.
1
1
@darrel_miller Even worse, most devs think it’s just presentation, not information at all
1