It's interesting how scalability seem to be perceived as the most important quality of a good architecture - that is not always the case.
2
2
@codemonkeyism Exactly my point.
1
@ewolff @codemonkeyism to me scalable also means organizational and product scalability
1
1
@pvblivs that might distinguish you from architects... ;)
2
.@ewolff we should discuss this: in my opinion an sw architect has to care about this kind of scalability as well (does it work in the org)
2
@pvblivs @ewolff A software architect has to care about everything; that’s the point of being an architect, is it not?
2
@stilkov @pvblivs If you care about everything without focusing you will fail.
2
1
@ewolff @stilkov I disagree. Architects is responsible to bring tech and the organization together to make it work. Ignoring parts, you fail
2
Replying to @pvblivs
@pvblivs @ewolff Caring doesn’t mean getting lost in all of the details. But if you’re an architect, most problems are ultimatley your fault

Sep 18, 2014 · 2:14 PM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @ewolff well put
1
@pvblivs @stilkov Yip. I think that's the best way to sum it up in 140 chars.
1
more replies