Calling it "Standard Markdown" without @gruber's support is wrong, even though I think he's as wrong technically as Winer was about RSS/Atom

Sep 4, 2014 · 5:04 AM UTC

4
3
2
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @gruber having written a book (almost) in asciidoc, I’m a bigger fan of that for longer form works.
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Having drama about something called "Standard Whatever" without involving both @w3c and @WHATWG is wrong for sure :-) @mnot @gruber
1