No doubt open source has “won” (whatever that means exactly), but if you see anything ethically superior about it, you’re fooling yourself
Aug 10, 2014 · 7:02 PM UTC
3
4
6
. @danielmarbach It’s become a pure business decision (maybe unless your code is under GPL (without a dual license).
1
1
2
@secboffin @simonbragreed I’m sure you know youtube.com/watch?v=-hCimLnI…
@stilkov more importantly, you can still have a bad closed/semi-open design and fool yourself into being "open" because your source code is.
1
@secboffin @stilkov I like the "do no evil" clause in the JSON licence :-)
@stilkov Would you say Wikipedia is ethically superior to Britannica? Seems so to me. Public sharing is a public good.