Oh, Apple. Swift book has zero matches for “thread” or “concurrency”. For a new language in 2014. Really?
3
14
6
@macintux @stilkov the document only describes the language, not the runtime. Threads are runtime. Clear separation -> good
2
Replying to @dkrizic
@dkrizic @macintux That hasn’t been the case for basically every language that was invented in the last 20 years

Jun 3, 2014 · 6:22 AM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @macintux I presume you agree, that this seprtion is positive. Actually a Java Thread is JVM, not language, but not separated clrly
1
@dkrizic @macintux I’m absolutely convinced that concurrency and parallelism should have language-level support.