I wonder: Are there well-known, profitable Open Source companies? I’m not talking about billion dollar acquisitions, but operating profits.

Apr 15, 2014 · 3:27 PM UTC

12
3
2
Replying to @frankfurtine
@frankfurtine Has been part of Novell for a long time, not sure. But maybe, yes.
Replying to @frankfurtine
@frankfurtine Right, completely forgot about that. Who knows …
@dl1ely @markusvoelter @ewolff There’s a difference in the degree of separation. E.g. we do some OSS @innoQ, but it’s mostly tangential
1
@dl1ely @markusvoelter @ewolff @innoq Not the way I’m referring to. OSS can (and should) be a part of a strategy. If can’t be *the* strategy
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov you mean, apart from Red Hat ?
1
@elefevre Yeah, I forgot about them. MySQL as well, though no one knows for sure. Any others?
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Neo technology? Typesafe? I don't know if they are profitable but seem fairly successful. And Basecamp (37 signals)?
2
@toredk Neo and Typesafe: I don’t think so, both are VC-backed and highly unlikely to be profitable (probably not even their goal yet).
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov What about Camunda?
1
@developmind Good example, I guess, thanks.
1