I think implementing a BPM engine using a BPM engine has become my new favorite architectural anti-pattern.

Apr 9, 2014 Β· 4:41 PM UTC

6
11
6
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov isn’t this an applauded feature of programming languages like Lisp? :-p
1
1
@pvblivs Well played. But no. Not everything meta is worth doing.
@kncvetko Very true, there are always very convincing reasons. Sad nonetheless.
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Isn't BPM the antipattern? /cc @hseeberger
1
@viktorklang @hseeberger Maybe it qualifies as a double anti-pattern then
1
more replies
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Hya, we have a bad experience with a UML codegenerator designed in UML and generated by itself. Bad idea of "bootstrapping".
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov So: we repeat our errors with every new high level design tool. Lack of understanding of "best tool for the job"?
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov If first BPM stands for Beats per Minute it could be one of the rare usecases where they make sense ;-)
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov I'll put it right next to the SQL database that has a "schema" table, describing the layout of another table (-> downhill)...