"Don't distribute your objects!" Micro Services Which side are you on?
1
@ewolff Hu? A microservice is clearly != an object…
1
@olivergierke put doesn't it imply fine grained remote calls?
1
@ewolff @olivergierke Depends on how literally one takes “micro”
1
@stilkov @olivergierke "a micro service is a simple application that sits around the 10-100 LOC mark" bit.ly/1kNQFYh
2
1
@ewolff @olivergierke I don’t know who has the authority to define that. Probably @martinfowler due to sheer follower power.
1
@stilkov @olivergierke Actually @martinfowler wrote bit.ly/1ifZeIs which does sound different.
2
Replying to @ewolff
@ewolff You know the system of systems thing I’m fond of? Still looking for a good name for those things. I don’t think it’s microservices.

Mar 13, 2014 · 8:26 AM UTC

3
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov What is wrong with System of Systems? And I agree that this approach is a good thing (TM)
3
@ewolff nothing wrong with it, just find the term “system” very overloaded
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Also I am wondering whether distributed communication is a must for these kinds of system
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Are you aware of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System… BTW?
1
@ewolff Yes, came across it a while ago, but considered it too academic. Maybe worth a closer look, thanks.
1
more replies