Replying to @dankurka
@dankurka That’s exactly what I meant. Why would I want to do that?
1
@stilkov So using SSH to work from my chromebook is a bad idea and I should not do this?
1
@dankurka You mean it can’t do that without NaCl? ;-)
1
@stilkov You should not reimplement software, if a compiler can do the job. SSH is a good example for that. I got plenty more.
1
@dankurka As usual, we don’t agree on the basics. Who came up with the idea of re-implementing ssh? Why would it have to run in the browser?
3
@stilkov If you look at Google, Mozilla, MS, they are all working on the web as a platform for what we now call apps. => Firefox OS....
1
@dankurka Vast differences between their approaches. My money is on Mozilla – only ones I believe to be in line with what works on the Web
2
@stilkov I think you need to read up on asm.js, not really inline, since this will be a different engine.
3
@dankurka You do have a point, and I’m not a big fan of asm.js either. I do consider it very slightly more “webby”, but I may be wrong
1
@stilkov Do not get me wrong, I do not like browser plugins either, but some things I need on my chromebook and PNaCl delivers them.
1
Replying to @dankurka
@dankurka I have no problem with that.

Nov 13, 2013 · 9:33 PM UTC