Jan Lehnardt is on Mastodon: @janl@narrativ.es retweeted
antirez @antirez
9 Jul 2013
HTTP 2.0 draft, a sad day for the internet -> tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ie…
5
24
10
@antirez @janl Why sad?
1
.@stilkov @fs111 @tobi @janl unilaterally wanted complexity without strong evidence of a big performance improvement to justify that.
4
2
6
@antirez are there any good articles for the interested bystander to understand the criticism? /cc @stilkov @tobi @janl
1
@fs111 @antirez @stilkov @tobi — @bsdphk’s phk.freebsd.dk/words/httpbis… for one.
2
2
6
@janl @fs111 @antirez @stilkov @tobi @bsdphk and the #haproxy 's authors one tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ta…
1
1
2
@vihaire @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi @bsdphk So you're suggesting that input other than Google's has been ignored?
3
@stilkov @vihaire @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi To be utterly blunt: HTTPbis is in the wrong hands for a good HTTP/2.0 to come out of it.
2
2
@bsdphk you mean @mnot is not the good guy to deal with that ? /cc @stilkov @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi
1
@vihaire @mnot @stilkov @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi I don't know @mnot well enough to tell. I'm talking about the WG, its goals & methods.
1
Replying to @bsdphk
@bsdphk @vihaire @mnot @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi @mnot What you're saying is the WG does not strive for the best consensus-based solution?

Jul 9, 2013 · 7:23 PM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov @vihaire @mnot @janl @fs111 @antirez @tobi I'm saying that the WG is looking backward, rather than forward. Same mistake as IPv6