Bunch of security geeks in the IETF are wondering about a canonical-JSON format, to facilitate signing. Good/bad idea?
10
1
@timbray I'm sure someone at IBM has already invented a canonical XML serialization of JSON. So, lock the doors.
1
2
1
@vambenepe @timbray I hope canonical JSON let's me sign my binary attachments in my "JSON with Attachments", JwA, proposal
1
@steveloughran Sorry, it's MTOM.
1
@vambenepe no, its DIME for JSON, D4J
2
Replying to @steveloughran
@steveloughran @vambenepe @timbray I think we need a JSON-I group to create a JSON-Basic Profile.

Feb 20, 2013 · 9:41 AM UTC