It's stupid to conclude anything about an architect's skills because they do or do not use UML. #archflamebait

Sep 28, 2012 · 8:13 AM UTC

5
3
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov well, I consider ignorance to be an indication of a lack of a skill. There're better ways to communicate architecture than UML
3
@sshishkin UML is just one tool. For some purposes, it's at least as good as anything else out there.
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov What should we think of a programmer still using flowcharts before writing programs, as some did in the late 60's?
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov #archflamebait maybe we CAN conclude something about one's disability to use abstractions properly...
1
@benjamin @stilkov no, no metric. imho understandability is the goal... and challenge for architects
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov Yes, and what would you evaluate an architect's skill?