Unfortunately common-->RT @squarepegsys: @mattbarcomb bah. that will never work. What will is fear, intimidation, and doubt.
1
@tastapod @estherderby @gdinwiddie @daverooneyca @mattbarcomb @squarepegsys It’s not a parody. He’s a famous VC now.
4
@mtnygard somehow, knowing he's a famous VC doesn't change my perception of him one iota from reading his blog...
1
@tastapod @mtnygard That perception being he's an ass? You have read bhorowitz.com/2012/04/25/our…, right?
1
@stilkov @mtnygard the perception being his management style and treatment of people is ass. His philanthropy is admirable (but why half?)
1
Replying to @tastapod
@tastapod OK; If company growth makes someone no longer suitable for their position, what's the right thing to do? Discuss unemotionally.

Aug 22, 2012 · 6:18 PM UTC

3
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov it was the hypocrisy of "I'm not enough of a CEO to stay and you're not enough salesman, so you go and I'll stay" #doublestandards
1
@tastapod I agree, and I'm sure he would too — many VC-funded companies replace the CEO at some point.
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov and realistically if someone has been with the company up to that point they might well be coachable into the next stage
1
@tastapod Sure, they're might; I suggest his advice applies to a situation where they don't
1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov I actually think it's bad business to ditch someone with history in the org - the cost of replacement is often hidden
2
@tastapod I think companies growing at a speed that makes VCs happy require management to act exactly like this. So it's good advice.
2