nitter
Erik Wilde
@dret
12 Jul 2012
#JSONLD
makes it first appearance as
@w3c
drafts! "JSON-LD Syntax 1.0"
w3.org/TR/2012/WD-json-ld-syβ¦
and "JSON-LD API 1.0"
w3.org/TR/2012/WD-json-ld-apβ¦
#RDF
1
3
2
ππ π€π πΎπ£ππππ βΉοΈ
@delitescere
12 Jul 2012
@dret
@w3c
@stilkov
while not as obtuse as the XSD turd, JSON-LD brings a convolution to JSON I expect the web community to reject.
1
Stefan Tilkov
@stilkov
12 Jul 2012
Replying to
@delitescere
@delitescere
@dret
I'm still undecided
Jul 12, 2012 Β· 8:28 PM UTC
1
ππ π€π πΎπ£ππππ βΉοΈ
@delitescere
12 Jul 2012
Replying to
@stilkov
@stilkov
that's because you are taking a methodical, researched, and deliberate approach to your opinion ;-)
1
Stefan Tilkov
@stilkov
13 Jul 2012
@delitescere
Yes of course; I trust there was no trace of irony in that statement