Functional Java looks like a nice library #JAXconf
1
Replying to @ewolff
@ewolff Best one can do in Java, I guess. But why bother? Better to go with a real functional JVM language instead IMO

Jul 10, 2012 · 5:36 PM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
@stilkov because Java developers are attached to Java - even by definition
2
@ewolff I know. There's still no rational argument for wanting to adopt functional programming, but not a functional language
1
more replies