The Twitter change where they switched everyone from their choice of timeline to ranked timeline reminds me of a question: why don't social media companies react to negative signals from users? The change trained me to stop checking the app since it filled my feed with garbage.
11
79
29
487
Dan, you only follow 55 people. You clearly choose carefully whose content you want so a chronological timeline works. Problem is most people follow indiscriminately and then need the algorithm to help them not ruin their own experience. They SAY they want chrono but they don't.
3
Definitely not true for me, and I follow quite a few people. Assuming people don鈥檛 mean what they *explicitly* say (and the PM believing they know better) seems very risky at least
1
6
Firstly, you're missing something crucial: you're not the customer. The success metric isn't giving you what you WANT, it's getting your engagement - causing stay on the site longer, & watching more ads. Chrono views dilute quality cuz most tweets aren't worthwhile.
2
Replying to @pinskinator @danluu
That鈥檚 a valid point, but not at all the one you made originally :)

Apr 16, 2022 路 6:30 AM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov @danluu
I think it's the same one, just approached from a different perspective. We exchange our engagement for entertainment. Ranked timelines are intended to be more entertaining. I'm sure Twitter did an insane amount of AB testing, and ultimately more people preferred the ranked view.