Reusability almost always adds unnecessary complexity, so is actively destructive to both maintainability and agility, IME. The characteristic you need is refactorability, not reusability.
20
53
13
271
Design for replacement, not for reuse (c) @stilkov
1
3
10
Replying to @Cripsky @allenholub
I think that was actually coined by either @samnewman or @boicy

Jan 20, 2022 · 12:17 PM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov @Cripsky @allenholub
Not sure I ever said those exact words, but I’ve railed against “reuse” mentality a lot. It might be a @boicy quote as he is great at coming up with stuff like this!
1
7