Sure, there are few use cases, there are many scams, and of course there’s the very questionable energy consumption of the PoW chains. But there are lots of smart folks trying to build legit use cases, using something else than PoW, trying to honestly innovate.
3
3
Many of those orgs are in the same league as your typical ML startup. They may fail, but they’re not all “evil”, and they’re not all stupid. Dismissing everything and everyone uniformly seems just wrong to me.
2
4
Blockchains and smart contracts are technologies with very limited applicability right now. There are good and bad implementations of both platforms and applications. People trying to improve that might succeed, or they might not. (FTR, I’m not one of them.) Time will tell.
2
1
4
Even the much derided PoW chains have one thing in their favor: They actually work in terms of meeting requirements in terms of not having to trust any single entity, although I’m happy to admit it’s highly questionable whether they do so at a justifiable cost. But they work.
4
2
Admittedly, it’s much easier to just call everyone an idiot or a scammer, and it’s sure going to get you more applause. With some superficial knowledge of how stuff works, you get bonus points for being a socially responsible, critical tech guru, so if that’s your thing …
7
1
Been thinking the whole morning about this thread, I felt seen.
Maybe I don't know not the technical details, but I know and understand enough from history, that I can justify my judgement of the whole mess against myself.
1
2
In addition: No other tech is promoted as aggressively as this… And the promotion has never been solving any real world issue. In the end, it's about the money game. Nothing else.
4
3
This and no other tech I have been involved with as a techie had such a completely alienating community. So there seems to be something inherently different going on. And I was in this for 2 years as an academic researcher, so it is not that I did not try.
1
2
