Replying to @ewolff
I said nothing different, though you could interpret it this way. I agree with your point. We managed to ruin another good idea by inventing some certificates and new job titles.
1
4
Hm, I was arguing this point: > if you have DevOps engineers, you don't do DevOps. I think those points are more or less unrelated.
1
An oversimplification because it correlated pretty often in my experience. You are right, not related.
1
To me SRE is the evolution of what had been the typical setup of IT ops and app management in cloud environments. You simply do not need a ops team who mimic an internal cloud vendor but the same shift in mindset for app management that should have happened on the dev side.
1
I think there are multiple points: - Not everything Google does makes sense for others. Google has a very huge scale. I think that is a good point. - SREs probably don't make sense outside Google. I am not sure why and would tend to disagree.
2
1
- SRE *teams* don't make sense outside Google because scale. I am not sure whether SREs imply a separate team - you probably can have just one SRE.
2
I spoke to @spanneberg who did SRE @InstanaHQ . Seemed to have worked well. software-architektur.tv/2021…
1
3
In hindsight, mixing SRE into this tweet was an oversimplification and a mistake. Sorry for this.
1
No problem. I have to admit that I am not fully comfortable discussing tweets in very fine detail. At the end, I myself do quite a few tweets quickly and that is part of the fun. And of course I do embarrassing errors in the process.
1
I fondly remember the time when people had debates like these in their blogs

Nov 9, 2021 · 7:34 AM UTC

1
This tweet is unavailable
No. Someone would write a lengthy blog post, one of their followers would see it in their RSS reader, write a lengthy answer on their own blog, and send a pingback (or leave a comment)