The closest way I’ve found to explain the weirdness of #NFT for art: They’re like a signed, numbered limited edition print, but the signature is not on the actual print, and not necessarily even by the artist

Oct 7, 2021 · 5:47 AM UTC

7
2
1
13
Replying to @stilkov
NFTs for the rest of us: bit.ly/3BjZseZ

fax2nft✨

Be a crypto artist! Turn anything into an NFT by faxing it

fax2nft.com
1
2
1
10
I love that they have an FAQ entry for “fax”
3
Replying to @stilkov
actually I always wondered why people pay so much money for art. A print of a famous painting is as beautiful and much easier to handle..
2
2
Replying to @stilkov
Except not limited, nor endorsed, nor valid in any sense other than by everyone pretending.
4
9
Replying to @stilkov
They’re also not necessarily art.
1
Replying to @stilkov
I think signed receipt with some information on is still the more accurate description.
1
7
Replying to @stilkov
Kind of a tech supported belief system :)
This tweet is unavailable
It’s what prompted my tweet