#domaindrivendesign is overrated tilkov.com/post/2021/03/01/d…

I agree with your article. If I had one remark on the contents, it's that you describe DDD without mentioning modelling, but your post isn’t about that of course. (Evans & Vernon use the word "model" at least 500 times in their books.)

I also imagine most people will agree with your article. There's a reason for that: it follows the pattern below, that makes an article hard to disagree with. (If it comes across as sarcastic, I promise it isn't meant to be, so please humour me.)

I think you’re right, and in fact I’ve pointed this out to people in exactly the same meta-fashion

This might be worth a post or article of its own. While I do think there are good reasons to criticize it, I think there’s something different with this particular thing in that I completely embrace it, but think there’s more to it

Whereas a lot of the usual standard criticism points out that this particular hype (whatever that might be) is nothing new and everyone’s been doing it for years

Or alternatively, that it has a certain set of problems (which are the ones that every proponent of it has been mentioning from the very beginning)