#domaindrivendesign is overrated tilkov.com/post/2021/03/01/d…
24
44
21
179
I agree with your article. If I had one remark on the contents, it's that you describe DDD without mentioning modelling, but your post isn’t about that of course. (Evans & Vernon use the word "model" at least 500 times in their books.)
2
1
4
I also imagine most people will agree with your article. There's a reason for that: it follows the pattern below, that makes an article hard to disagree with. (If it comes across as sarcastic, I promise it isn't meant to be, so please humour me.)
2
1
2
I think you’re right, and in fact I’ve pointed this out to people in exactly the same meta-fashion
1
1
This might be worth a post or article of its own. While I do think there are good reasons to criticize it, I think there’s something different with this particular thing in that I completely embrace it, but think there’s more to it
1
1
1
Replying to @stilkov @mathiasverraes
Whereas a lot of the usual standard criticism points out that this particular hype (whatever that might be) is nothing new and everyone’s been doing it for years

Mar 1, 2021 · 10:08 PM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov @mathiasverraes
Or alternatively, that it has a certain set of problems (which are the ones that every proponent of it has been mentioning from the very beginning)
1
In this particular case though, I think that some folks following DDD don’t grasp that it doesn’t even attempt to define everything there is to know, yet treat it that way
1