What utter bullshit

Grateful it's not technical people publishing ethical tone-deaf papers with ML this time Less disturbing to see it from subjective humanities people like psychologists rather than real scientists

It seems I was wrong and the paper actually says the opposite of what everyone, including me, assumed

Yes, still tone-deaf handling It's like Twitter's crop algo, doesn't matter that it's statistically is unbiased. It's still played into the impression about algos being biased.

No, this is more like accusing research that shows Twitter’s bias of bias

Not really. People who work with these subjects need to be very clear communicators. We complain when journalists use clickbait headlines for uncontroversial articles. Researchers in controversial subjects need to be held to at least equal standards