What utter bullshit
This tweet is unavailable
3
2
11
Grateful it's not technical people publishing ethical tone-deaf papers with ML this time Less disturbing to see it from subjective humanities people like psychologists rather than real scientists
1
It seems I was wrong and the paper actually says the opposite of what everyone, including me, assumed
1
1
Yes, still tone-deaf handling It's like Twitter's crop algo, doesn't matter that it's statistically is unbiased. It's still played into the impression about algos being biased.
1
Replying to @saarw
No, this is more like accusing research that shows Twitter’s bias of bias

Sep 25, 2020 · 5:32 PM UTC

1
1
Replying to @stilkov
Not really. People who work with these subjects need to be very clear communicators. We complain when journalists use clickbait headlines for uncontroversial articles. Researchers in controversial subjects need to be held to at least equal standards
1
1
OK, I agree that the communication on Twitter could have been much better
1