What utter bullshit
This tweet is unavailable
3
2
11
Skimming the paper, they're not arguing that the computer can detect if someone is trustworthy, they're arguing they can detect is something is *perceived* as trustworthy.
1
1
4
If so, why couldn’t the author be bothered to mention that in what feels like a hundred tweets?
1
2
He does? He talks about replicating biases that humans have, and also he's a small account with 1200 followers who were mostly other academics and was not expecting to becoming the main character of Twitter today
2
1
2
Also, the paper is called "Social attributions from faces bias human choices"
1
1
1
Replying to @hillelogram
I only read the tweets and tons of comments, and was biased into the wrong conclusion.

Sep 25, 2020 · 4:33 PM UTC

2
1
3
Replying to @stilkov
I want to say in advance that the tweetstorm I'm about to drop is ragetweeting everyone else, not you, I only started writing it after seeing hundreds of people misinterpret it
1
1
We all deserve it, so please rage ahead
2
Replying to @stilkov @hillelogram
Yet I still felt I had done my due diligence as I re-read it (the thread) multiple times, and waited for a few hours before tweeting. And still messed up.
1
1
1
more replies