Replying to @larsr_h
XML namespaces were a bad idea, and trying to cast HTML into XML turned out to be a bad idea, too. Trust me, I was there when it happened
11
Among others, the requirement for well-formedness of the whole document made it really hard to have a valid page from 2 sources in any setting that was a little more complex. Especially third party providers can easily make documents break easily.
2
3
Right. So any tool acting in the interest of the end user, especially the browser, chose to parse “invalid” markup, too, and rightly so
1
It could be, but this isn't a theoretical argument. Adopting XML in HTML has been tried through XHTML, with less then stellar results. I reckon there won't be another shot short of inventing a new document format altogether.
1
Replying to @larsr_h @Argorak
One of my favorites: xml.com/pub/a/2004/07/21/div…

Jun 28, 2020 · 6:20 PM UTC

1