For the record, at Uber, we're moving many of our microservices to what @copyconstruct calls macroservices (wells-sized services). Exactly b/c testing and maintaining thousands of microservices is not only hard - it can cause more trouble long-term than it solves the short-term.
Cindy Sridharan @copyconstruct
6 Apr 2020
- Microservices are hard. - Building reliable and testable microservices is a lot harder than most folks think - Effectively *testing* microservices requires a ton of tooling and foresight. - A Netflix/Uber style microservices isn't required by many (most?) orgs. - Macroservices?
92
1,048
292
2,977
We’ve been advocating this for a while scs-architecture.org

SCS: Self-contained Systems

An architectural approach that separates a larger system’s functionality into many independent, collaborating systems.

scs-architecture.org
2
10
49
Over a decade I believe...
1
2
Almost. First commit 5 years ago.
2
To me the concept of SCS is “microservices done right” since chatty systems makes autonomy difficult/impossible
2
1
4
That looks like mini-apps more than microservices
2
Replying to @vivainio @jbogard @mosesjones @GergelyOrosz @copyconstruct
Agreed, mini apps would have been a fine name, too.

Apr 7, 2020 · 2:31 PM UTC