How is it developers killed the use of XML for JSON, a format that has no ability to add comments? What developers decided this was a good idea? A format which half the lines in the editor have 1 character in them.
270
263
86
1,196
JSON is easier to read and write IMO, but comments would certainly be nice.
4
2
53
No way it’s so ugly. Imagine if an HTML page was written in JSON lol. Totally unreadable.
15
1
54
That’s because both XML and HTML are markup languages and thus do a pretty great job when they’re used for markup. The mistake was trying to use XML for records with metadata, for which it is massive overkill
1
2
21
If all you want to do is send some tagged data, JSON has about 5% of XML’s complexity and is a better choice most of the time.
2
9
Replying to @stilkov @kellabyte @jamestharpe
But you know all that, and I agree that it sucks that JSON does not have comments.

Jan 28, 2019 · 10:19 PM UTC

2
4
Replying to @stilkov @kellabyte @jamestharpe
Also if the whole ws-* and XML Schema had not happened, XML wouldn’t have lost its popularity so badly.
8
Replying to @stilkov @kellabyte @jamestharpe
Sorry Stefan, you can't convince someone looking for comments instead of code/script expressiveness by describing usages and pros and cons. Anyway nice try man.