Replying to @stilkov
Uhhh so your argument is the law is vague and everyone is in violation but it’s okay because if you try to be somewhat compliant the EU won’t attack you. Yeah, lawfully that’s not something a business can roll the dice with.
1
Yet it’s what every business currently operating in the EU has been doing since May 25, and the world hasn’t ended yet
2
2
It’s utterly pointless to design a law that is ineffective in protecting users and also impossible to comply to and still be vulnerable to audits even after you spent millions to vaguely comply.
1
My prediction is it’ll have hugely positive effects for users’ privacy because, as @clemensv said, it has teeth. I also predict courts won’t follow pointless interpretations that don’t have users’ interests in mind
2
Even with the law being as it is, it already forced massive changes in behavior.
3
1
It’s also caused some businesses to close doors and employees are left unemployed.
1
It did? Can you share some examples?
1
Sorry, but I call bullshit on most of those.
4
And to me, seeing companies that aren’t even EU based companies closing doors and laying off people because they fear an EU law is greatly problematic. This is actually happening.
1
Replying to @kellabyte @clemensv
That would be relevant if it were happening in meaningful numbers, which I contend it just isn’t

Oct 1, 2018 · 7:25 AM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov @clemensv
That’s sad. That’s really sad. Knowing anyone is unjustly losing a job isn’t a light issue in my opinion. It makes me sad you just brush it off like that. We should demand better laws.