Thinking some more about the voting use case, I think there might be value in using a blockchain to send aggregated results “up” in a tamper-proof way, while retaining paper (and the associated paper trail) for the actual voting
3
Tamper-proof: Depends on the number of hosts associated to your blockchain-network. So maybe not the best approach for a centrally organized election.
1
1
Replying to @Chris_Betz
Of course, it all depends wether you base your trust on the centralized authority or on the blockchain’s guarantees. YMMV.

Jun 4, 2018 · 11:54 AM UTC

1
Replying to @stilkov
True, but proof-of-work might be too easy (=cheap) to tamper with wrt our elections, see crypto51.app #51percent