CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @jaffathecake
Now progressively enhance it to make it indistinguishable 😉
1
“A Dragon spacecraft could safely float in the void that is Elon Musk's understanding of the cultural and legal labyrinth of expression and identity in a free society” techcrunch.com/2022/04/26/el…
1
7
1
14
Replying to @benedictevans
Tbh I haven’t met a crypto sis yet tho
This looks like a very nice event, and the fact that it’s a charity event for #Ukraine makes it even better: devopsdays.com.ua
1
2
2
Gottseidank haben wir den erfahrenen Staatsmann Scholz zum Kanzler gewählt und nicht diese unerfahrenen Grünen, die sich und uns ja nur blamieren würden deutschlandfunk.de/waffenlie…
2
23
Replying to @LilithWittmann
Das sehe ich sicher auch so.
1
Replying to @LilithWittmann
Sei ein bisschen gnädig, für die DSGVO-konforme Nutzung eines SaaS-Dienstes ist ja nicht nur wichtig, welche Inhaltsdaten dort hinterlegt werden, sondern vor allem auch, wie mit den Nutzer-/Nutzungsdaten umgegangen wird. GitHub ist da (leider) auch kein No-Brainer.
1
3
Replying to @Grady_Booch
I really disliked the Jobs one. It got way too many facts wrong
(And just FTR, I believe there are excellent reasons *against* nuclear power, too. I’m just not convinced we know which of the available bad choices is worse.)
2
Not my area of expertise, sorry – I’d have to do the same kind of Google search you would do yourself. My guess is most nuclear physicists are not against nuclear power, but that’s just a guess.
1
2
Scheint, als dürfe man nun „Girls’Day“ anstatt „Girls'Day“ oder gar Girls‘Day schreiben. Zwei, drei Jahre noch, dann geht auch „Girls’ Day“. Aber auch mit falscher Typografie eine tolle Sache: girls-day.de/ innoq.com/de/news/2022/04/gi…
2
3
7
I’m not suggesting there’s no drastic lobbying going on. Yet compared to scientific consensus about the climate crisis, where there are no deniers worth listening to, there are serious scientists in favor of nuclear power.
2
2
Replying to @codepitbull @spdde
Completely agreed, most mainstream coalition politicians were only marginally better in that regard
2
It seems to me there’s no scientific consensus regarding whether or not nuclear power is the lesser evil. Assessing the risks, as well as the economical and political consequences, seem way too hard for that. In any case, for Germany, that ship has probably sailed for good
1
1
Replying to @stwarmbrunn
Workout auf Apple Watch reicht für meine mehr so mittleren Bemühungen völlig
1
3
Replying to @ifesdjeen @spdde
I see. Phasing out nuclear energy ASAP was one of the party’s founding, core beliefs in the 80s, and if you believe nuclear power to be the worst possible choice, anything else is viable transition support
1
The Greens prove that you can support bad policies without corporate lobbying being the reason, too
1
Replying to @ifesdjeen @spdde
You mean fossil fuel interests might have been supporting the Greens to end nuclear power? That would be an incredibly implausible conspiracy theory tbh. Lots to criticize about them, of course, but that would be not one of those things
1
2
Replying to @GerritBeine
Sag mir bitte, dass Du denen kein Geld gibst, um den kompletten Quatsch zu lesen
2
7
Men like him are the reason I never voted for @spdde, and probably never will. Lots of talk about the common good, but a very clear sense of personal entitlement as priority number one
Gerhard Schröder has become the most prominent face of a long era of miscalculation that left Germany deeply reliant on Russian gas. He expresses no regret and has also profited handsomely from it, earning millions while promoting Russian energy interests. nyti.ms/3s9lC11
2
3
33