CEO/Principal Consultant at INNOQ, he/him, software architect, RESTafarian, conference tourist. Works at innoq.com. Fediverse: @stilkov@innoq.social

Germany
Joined April 2007
Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Maybe in 2021, organizations should legally be required to to prove they can build and/or run a public health-related site themselves before they’re allowed to do it? And decision makers should be required to pass a basic knowledge test?
Yesterday, the German state I live in (NRW) launched its website for vaccination registration. Predictably, it broke down. After all, there’s no way for a poor country like Germany to create a website that can handle 700 requests/second. That’s black magic
3
13
3
73
Yesterday, the German state I live in (NRW) launched its website for vaccination registration. Predictably, it broke down. After all, there’s no way for a poor country like Germany to create a website that can handle 700 requests/second. That’s black magic
26
46
17
282
Replying to @pvblivs
Vielleicht, kann mich nicht mehr erinnern. Musste man das? Konnten die das nicht auch einfach so nutzen?
1
1
Replying to @pvblivs
Ne, Energieversorger
1
Replying to @rotnroll666
Passwort-Manager, daher kein Problem.
4
Überraschende Neuigkeit des Tages: Ich habe gerade einen E-POST Brief bekommen
9
22
Replying to @clemensv
Ähem. Ich würde gerne ein „die bei öffentlichen Ausschreibungen oft zum Zuge kommen“ als Einschränkung ergänzen
2
1
23
Replying to @crichardson
We definitely agree there are tons of things that are a far worse problem
1
1
Replying to @markusvoelter
I don’t have a problem with that, I do it all the time myself. I’m talking about retweeting that “Awesome talk” tweet that somebody else mentioned you in
2
1
2
Replying to @martinkl
I’d say that’s quite amazing for one year of practice👏
2
“Wrong” is too harsh a word. I just dislike it. I also block accounts that send promoted tweets, so I’m probably hardly a prototypical user
Replying to @pesterhazy
Hadn’t thought of it like that before, but yes, “clumsy” is a good characterization of what it feels like to me
1
Replying to @simonbrown
By all means, link to that content! And in any case, of course YMMV and I’m just a curmudgeon and possibly can be ignored safely ;)
1
Replying to @bjartnes
I fully agree you should tweet about your own content
1
Replying to @martinfowler
I never noticed, so I definitely do not think it’s too much
1
1
Replying to @simonbrown
Other people mentioning you is great, of course, maybe they’ll turn into followers. But people who follow you already don’t need much convincing anymore, do they? I prefer to stick to likes and occasional replies.
1
1
Replying to @ogeisser
We use a public CA. Not sure what you’re referring to regarding malware – the general problem that end-to-end-encrypted communication can’t be intercepted? I consider that a feature, not a bug
Replying to @lawley
I see. Good question. It only helps if you have the other party’s public key, e.g. because you’ve received a signed mail from them before or can get it from a trusted directory. Workable in company settings. But all mail clients handle this quite gracefully.
Replying to @lawley
Ensuring only the intended recipients can read mails I send? Not sure I understand the question
1
More importantly, why is no-one working on making it less of a hassle? I know it doesn’t encrypt metadata, but it’s still so much better than most messaging services, let alone unencrypted, web-based email from a security perspective.
7
12